" Giuoco Pianissimo " is an old Italian phrase meaning "very quiet game"; if you can't remember that you might prefer if we just call this line " Old Stodge "...
It's probably one of the most common ways for games to start, and I think it's one of the worst. What's the problem?
Beginners (and others) should play open games:open games are more lively and more fun open games are easier to get ideas in open games are better for learning about the game
Whatever is happening in Old Stodge, it is most unlikely that lines are going to be opened very soon. Both sides clamp down on the opponent's Queen's Pawn, preventing the opening of the game. The whole position gets bogged down in sticky toffee and both players are often bored and confused by the positions that come about.
It's enough to put you off chess! The position is blocked, the sides are equal and it's hard to get things going. It can take a long time to beat worse players because things are so solid. Also, it may be that almost every game you play ends up something like this, and perhaps you would like some variety.
In fact, probably the best plan in the standard Old Stodge position is to aim for d3-d4 after a sequence like: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. d3 d6 6. Bg5! h6! 7. Bxf6! Qxf6 8. Nd5 Qd8 9. c3! [see the document on The Italian game ] So, if you are going to play d3-d4 eventually, why not go for a more open game from the start? This document is about, is describing how to try and get an open game, with Pawn exchanges, with either colour.1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. d3 d6 6. Bg5! h6! 7. Bxf6! Qxf6 8. Nd5 Qd8 9. c3! Play the main line Giuoco Piano 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4. c2-c3 5. d2-d4
[More? See the document on The Italian Game ]Play the Evans' Gambit 4. b2-b4 4...Bxb4 5. c2-c3 Play the Scotch Game 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3. d2-d4 3...exd4 4. Nxd4 4. Bc4
[More? See the document on
air jordan 12 gamma blue fake contacts
Every staff position has a grade level. Local HR offices administer the compensation system for employees in their units, evaluating jobs and determining the grade of each position based on professional knowledge, skills, required education and experience and job responsibilities; Harvard benchmarks; and the complexity and scope relative to other University positions.
Administrative and professional positions: Every professional, nonunion position is classified by a job grade from 55-64. Benchmarks are developed by the Harvard Human Resources Compensation and local HR offices, with a position’s grade reflecting factors such as scope and impact of decision-making, budget management and resource generation, supervisory/management responsibility and planning.
Clerical and technical positions: Clerical and technical jobs, including HUCTW staff, are classified in job grades 47-56. Generic position descriptions for each grade are available. Service and trade roles are classified in job grades 01-43. These jobs have been determined to be eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Salary ranges within each pay grade are based on qualifications, skills, experience, equity in comparison to similar positions, and external market values. Salary ranges allow for differences among positions within the same grade as well increasing levels of responsibility and performance within the same job.
The salary ranges in the table below reflect base salaries paid for all positions at a given grade across the University. Typically a new hire can expect a starting salary somewhere in the lower part of the range. The amount will vary based on the position and the candidate’s relevant experience. No employee will be paid below the minimum.
FY18Salary Ranges: Effective July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2018 for administrative and professional, non-bargaining unit employees:FY18Salary Ranges: July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2018
*Grade 55 and 56 ranges mirror the HUCTW ranges, therefore areupdated effective October 1, 2017 in accordance with the HUCTW contract.
Effective October 1, 2017 for HUCTW members:October 1, 2017